<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Star Trek Trailer &#8212; I Am Not Amused</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.john-zhu.com/blog/2008/11/19/new-star-trek-trailer-i-am-not-amused/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.john-zhu.com/blog/2008/11/19/new-star-trek-trailer-i-am-not-amused/</link>
	<description>Useful Resources for Some, Useless Rants for Others</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 18:18:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gypsy_cat</title>
		<link>http://www.john-zhu.com/blog/2008/11/19/new-star-trek-trailer-i-am-not-amused/comment-page-1/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>gypsy_cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 05:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-zhu.com/blog/?p=177#comment-388</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m hoping that the trailer was aimed at non-Trek fans and was not really representative of the movie as a whole. After all, fans are going to see the movie no matter how terrible it sounds, so maybe the marketing department was trying to get a different audience interested in the film (which, to judge by the trailer, is an audience of 13-year-old boys). 

Well, one can hope, anyway. I&#039;m fearing that the movie will come out looking like a generic action flick with characters who just happen to be named Kirk, McCoy, and Spock. I&#039;m not in the least impressed by the underwear model they&#039;ve got playing Kirk (Kirk&#039;s supposed to be paunchy, people! Paunchy!), though their choice for Spock is credible, at least in terms of looks. And kiddie Kirk was just annoying. Why is he driving a 300-year-old car, anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m hoping that the trailer was aimed at non-Trek fans and was not really representative of the movie as a whole. After all, fans are going to see the movie no matter how terrible it sounds, so maybe the marketing department was trying to get a different audience interested in the film (which, to judge by the trailer, is an audience of 13-year-old boys). </p>
<p>Well, one can hope, anyway. I&#8217;m fearing that the movie will come out looking like a generic action flick with characters who just happen to be named Kirk, McCoy, and Spock. I&#8217;m not in the least impressed by the underwear model they&#8217;ve got playing Kirk (Kirk&#8217;s supposed to be paunchy, people! Paunchy!), though their choice for Spock is credible, at least in terms of looks. And kiddie Kirk was just annoying. Why is he driving a 300-year-old car, anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.john-zhu.com/blog/2008/11/19/new-star-trek-trailer-i-am-not-amused/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-zhu.com/blog/?p=177#comment-307</guid>
		<description>Agreed. I&#039;m hoping Leonard Nimoy&#039;s involvement is a good sign, but I suspect his role will be little more than a cameo. This looks like dreck. Why can&#039;t we get the Worf movie we desperately deserve?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. I&#8217;m hoping Leonard Nimoy&#8217;s involvement is a good sign, but I suspect his role will be little more than a cameo. This looks like dreck. Why can&#8217;t we get the Worf movie we desperately deserve?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

